Lane Robins ([info]lanerobins) wrote,
@ 2009-01-27 23:05:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
So I've got a bit of free time, if there is such a beast, and I'm trying to catch up on my To Be Read Pile o' Doom.  It's been kind of bugging me, how behind I've gotten.  I've always been an enormous reader, and of late. . . not so much. 

Part of it can be blamed on writing: writing takes up reading time, writing makes me crazy editor on other people's books, writing makes my eyes hurt until I want to pull them out of my head and find a hobby that just doesn't require them.

But, I think most of all?  Reading is not a multi-tasking event.  And this is a multi-tasking world.  In high school, college, etc, I used to grab a stack of books, and hurl myself into the comfy chair, sprawl on the bed, the floor, wherever there was light and space, and go for it.  Now, unless the book is wildly hard to put down, I can't help myself.  I think about what I should be doing, what I need to do, what I could be doing.  I try to do other things while reading, and really--the only thing you can do with any degree of success while reading, is eat. 

On the other hand, while watching TV, you can successfully, do your laundry folding, check email, check newsfeeds, play with the cats, make dinner, talk on the telephone (if I'm being terribly rude to the caller), even hit the treadmill.  Reading doesn't allow for any of that without disruption.  Writing, oddly, does.  I'm a fit and spurt writer, a hundred words here--flee the desk--a hundred words there--flee the desk.  Things get done all around me.

But you know?  I really miss reading.  I learned to set aside writing time; maybe I need to set aside reading time.  I can steal time here and there, but it's just not the same experience at all.  I miss the immersive days, where my body might as well have been a carcass while I read.  Nothing distracting me, nothing disrupting me, and if I got up at all, it was with the book glued to my face.  (Yes, I was that reader.  The one who wandered school hallways with a book open and a dazed expression.)  Fantasy and science fiction, even horror, more than any other genres require that kind of immersion.  Mysteries, you can set down.  Chick lit, romance, lit, adventure.  All of it can be put down, generally without distress.  But fantasy. . . I put down a George R R Martin book and there's a need for transition from his world to mine and back again.  It's hard to let go, harder to get back into it.  Science fiction's the same, at least any SF book with an Other World setting.  And Horror?  It's all about atmosphere.  You lose that momentum and make a trip back to the real world--you're in danger of gaining perspective, of stepping back in at just the wrong moment where the whole thing just seems sort of. . . silly.  

This may explain why out of all the books bought last year, the ones that remain unread are 90% high fantasy or elaborate SF.  And the ones that I've been picking up are now-world settings, for the most part; quick paced adventures with a modern feel.  I want to read the books malingering on my shelves.  I've been drooling over Marie Brennan's Midnight Never Come for so long that she's finished the sequel to it.  Yeah, it's past time to add reading to my schedule.

How do you guys do it?  Can you read high fantasy in spurts?  

Currently reading, or attempting to--I put it down last week and haven't picked it up again: Michael Chabon's Gentlemen of the Road.   


(15 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]skarsol
2009-01-28 06:34 am UTC (link)
I learned log ago to compartmentalize stories because of my absentmindedness. I'll be concurrently reading three or four fantasy/sci-fi stories at once but it all works out because I can slip into that specific world fairly quickly since I grew up such that I would frequently lose books or try to read in situations where I didn't have whatever my current book was on me. Just have to remind yourself of the basic tenets of whatever world it is when you pick the book up.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]lanerobins
2009-01-28 04:24 pm UTC (link)
I might try that. Not the losing books so much, I do enough of that! But a quick mental note that oh yes, character A from the city of giant winged mushrooms, etc etc. I'll see if it works. If so, yay! It'll make me so much more willing to drag around high fantasy books as my purse book.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]lazy_iris
2009-01-28 06:39 am UTC (link)
Hi! I'm one of your fans :-P Love Maledicte, can't wait for Kings & Assassins (I've basically recommended Maledicte to everyone I know, but I won't lend them my copy because I'm fiercely protective of my favorite books. I tell them they have to buy it.)

Anyway, I'm pretty much in agreement with you on this entry, and I was totally the kid in high school who always had my nose in a book, too, bumping into anyone who didn't get out of the way. George R R Martin requires a very high level of commitment, considering each of his books has about a thousand characters and is the length of four urban fantasy novels. I can't read sf or fantasy in small spurts like that, I get lost and confused, and start forgetting minor characters and locations. A few weeks ago I started Wizard's First Rule and had to devote three days to finishing it. If I put down an sff book for longer than a few hours, I have a hard time getting back into it.

On the subject of them being hard to put down, do you feel sad or empty or like the real world is just boring when they're over and there's no sequel?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]lanerobins
2009-01-28 04:29 pm UTC (link)
It's really amazing we didn't fall down stairs in HS (or get pushed!) but no, wandering the halls in a book seemed perfectly doable back then.

The after effects of good books? It really depends on the book. Sometimes, I just feel deeply satisfied (Swordspoint, Bridge of Birds). Sometimes, yeah, I'm really sad that I'm done with the book and start doing this weird cherry-picking of scenes, going back and skimming my favorite bits so it's not quite over yet (Death of the Necromancer). And yeah, sometimes, I immediately run to see what else they've written. The last case of that was Jonathan Strange and Mr Norrell, which besides being so much fun, was just layered with stuff I wanted to know about and that she never got around to telling me! Yeah. I was sad then.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]lazy_iris
2009-01-28 05:25 pm UTC (link)
I loved Swordspoint and Death of the Necromancer.

I never got pushed, but I did have the book snatched out of my hand or my bag a couple times because whoever it was wanted to know what I was reading.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]kijjohnson
2009-01-28 07:00 am UTC (link)
A few years back, I mostly stopped reading except for research and online. It is hard to find the endless hours that are the best way to fall into a book; but I also found that I just didn't want to as much. Lately it's been all books I haven't read in 25 years or more.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]lanerobins
2009-01-28 04:34 pm UTC (link)
Well, I'm not going to quibble about your research results! But why do you suppose the urge goes away? For me, it's the time-guilt. The thought that I should be doing my own writing, rather than losing hours and hours in someone else's.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]hildebabble
2009-01-28 03:22 pm UTC (link)
I hear ya. I am my own worst distraction when reading.

I'm on my own odyssey right now, trying to do Wheel of Time for the first time. The thing that seems to distract me the most is the damn glossary in the back, because for some reason, I need to compulsively check the glossary every so often.

There was a time when I avoided big fantasy because I didn't want to get too invested in a book. But it's always worth it to try.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]lanerobins
2009-01-28 04:38 pm UTC (link)
Oh, you're braver than I am. I'm going to slink back toward high fantasy, choosing a book with only a few POVs, maybe a trilogy. I hear you on the glossary though; the only thing more distracting is one of those character lists in the beginning. I always feel like those are saying "Give up now. You'll never keep us straight." and then instead of reading, I'm constantly going back and double-checking who people are, when honestly, if the writer had left the list out, I would have managed on my own.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]babarnett
2009-01-28 05:05 pm UTC (link)
I wish I knew how I used to devour books the way I did, especially since I'm a slow reader. Setting aside reading time has been the only way I've been able to get my reading done lately. Otherwise I'd read a chunk of a book, then not be able to come back to it for weeks, at which point I'd feel like I needed to read it all over again to get back into the world and remind myself what was going on.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]lanerobins
2009-01-28 10:02 pm UTC (link)
I think that's actually part of my problem. These days I seem to have two reading speeds: light-weight book skim and line by line analysis. I need to rediscover that happy medium, where the internal editor is toned down and so is the brain. Honestly, I've given myself headaches speeding through things. Just 'cause I'm a quick reader (paragraph gulper) doesn't mean I have to read everything fast fast fast.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]maggiedr
2009-01-28 07:15 pm UTC (link)
I feel what you're saying. Maybe it has to do with adulthood and the accumulation of responsibilities. I remember my mother saying that my dad made her feel guilty for reading while breast-feeding, like she should be focusing on the baby. I couldn't read and breastfeed because it made me too drowsy.

I can read a magazine or browse a catalog while watching TV. I'd like to say that I fold laundry or do other useful things, but I don't. But if I wanted to, I could treadmill and watch television. TV wins out over reading because it requires less energy while at the same time, one can multi-task.

I used to average about 5 books a week, until my late twenties. Granted, a lot of them were garbage in, garbage out. Now I am lucky to read a book in a week. I start many more than I finish. I think for me, the Odyssey experience and subsequent rounds of critiquing mass amounts of stories (during TNEO and local crit groups) has burned me out to a large extent. I've finally learned to turn off the editor/critiquer when reading for pleasure, but I have wound up reading so many stories and chapters that I wouldn't normally choose to read, I guess it has made reading more work than it used to be in the past.

As for the fantasy genre, I am finding it harder and harder to immerse into yet another realm of exotic names, pantheon of gods and goddesses, along with another twist on the rules of magic. Definitely suffering fantasy burnout. I think I'd just as soon pick up a traditional sword and sorcery tale and feel comfortable with the setting.

I am reading the "Genevieve" novels by Jack Yeovil (Kim Newman) right now, set in the Warhammer universe. It's been tough going only because I went out of town and left the book behind (limited packing space and it is a fat book). The best way for me to commit to a novel is to start it in the afternoon, instead of at night when I'm falling asleep. Alas, I feel obligated to be doing too many other things and so that rarely happens.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]lanerobins
2009-01-28 09:59 pm UTC (link)
I didn't know Kim Newman wrote warhammer books. Damn. More books to look into.

I feel you with the fantasy names, gods, (and yes I'm aware I'm a hypocrite!). I've sort of gotten mean about it. I want to say why are your gods different/special/worth reading about. Brandon Sanderson hooked me in simply because he wrote a stand alone fantasy novel, and a wonderful first chapter. These days I get ten chapters or so into a fantasy book, and get a little itchy, and then realize oh wait, this is only going to be book one out of however many and nothing will really be resolved. . . and the next thing I know, the book's going thunk to the floor. I'm a lot more patient if I know it's going to be a trilogy and not a ten part epic.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Anonymous)
2009-01-28 08:10 pm UTC (link)
I gave up trying to read one book at one time about the time I had kids. Too many distractions. It is a rare day that I can afford the time or the determination to stay put. So, I have stations throughout my house. I pick up the book at the closest station when I have a moment. The books genre and how much concentration is required determines which station the book is located. An American history book is by my bed. Very interesting, but puts me to sleep in about five pages. I've been reading that one for about six months now. And no, I will not admit to which page I am on. Those requiring the most concentration are in the closet. It takes the kids a little while to find me. :)
-h

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]lanerobins
2009-01-28 09:54 pm UTC (link)
Hey pretty soon they're going to be of the age where you can put up the infamous sign from my family. The "If you're not bleeding, if the house isn't burning down, if no one's in imminent life-threatening danger. . . GO AWAY!"

I have to admit to keep a collection of horror short story books by my dining room table--that way, I can read one while eating lunch. Of course, right now I can't SEE my table for the paperwork, but I'm sure the books are still there.

(My biggest problem is hiding from the cat. If I'm stealing a few minutes in bed after waking up, she likes to wander between me and the book, me and the book, until sneezing ensues.)

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(15 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…